Voice
in the Crowd
By
Pete Chaney
IPS Features


Return to Current IPS Features

IPS Features

Return to Catalogue

IPS Features Staff

International Press Service

 






President Clinton—Hillary, that is

There was a lot to be learned in the presidential election of 2004—if anybody was paying attention.  It was difficult to see what was happening beyond the smoke and fury of TV ads, one-liners catering to public fears and an abundance of mud for slinging.

The frenzy gained so much momentum that supporters of a candidate rallied around him to put him on a pedestal immune from harm.  Any weaknesses were glossed over and the supporter could idolize the chosen candidate.

At the same time, the opposing candidate was given the public relations to reduce him to political rubble.  Initial disagreement with that candidate went through the stages from disgust down to frantic hatred.  Seldom in modern times have such emotions been raised for and against candidates.  Seldom have the opposing parties ending the campaign with such national animosity.

It wasn’t just one party.  Both indulged in the shoddiest of tricks in the name of winning an election.  No slur was left unused.  No stone was left unthrown.  Each candidate was trashed beyond recognition by the opposition.  It was a battle of the Madison Avenue public image creators.  They taught George W. Bush how to walk and how to talk.  They tried and failed, until it was too late, to teach John Kerry how to smile.

Even in a time when America was on a war footing, the badge of military service took a paradoxical twist.  John Kerry’s active duty during the Vietnam War should have worked for him.  It worked against him.  George W. Bush’s lack of active duty during the same war should have hurt him.  Instead, his National Guard service and photos in flight jackets worked for him.

Score another one for Madison Avenue.

During a period when many Americans wonder why we invaded Iraq and if the deaths of Americans were worth it, the GOP campaign convinced voters first it was a preemptive strike against weapons of mass destruction.  When that treatment evaporated, the rallying cry was we went in for Iraqi freedom.  More attention and investigation was given President Bill Clinton over Whitewater and Monica Lewinsky than over the reasons to invade Iraq and perks to Halliburton.

Only a courteous mention was made to issues of the campaign.  No one asked why America was the target of terrorists, or how we could diffuse it—other than dropping another bomb.  No one asked how an economy could go from a surplus to a $7-trillion deficit.  No one asked how an administration supposedly fiscally conservative could continue to cut taxes and increase spending.  No one cared that our children’s children and future generations must labor under the weight of debt.

A side issue showed the weakness of the electoral system, but it’s been around so long no one complained that an individual’s vote doesn’t count if it’s cast in a state overwhelmingly voting for the opposing candidate.  The outdated Electoral College was born with the nation, in a time when communication was snail paced and voters might know the local elector they could choose and expect him to select the best man for president.  These days we know more about a candidate than the neighbor who has lived next door for years.

Religion made uncomfortable inroads into the election process.  If America puts religion on the ballot, it stands the danger of becoming a government dictated by a specific religious belief.  We have seen the danger of that in other countries, especially Islamic where no other belief is tolerated.  Our founders left to old country to have freedom of religion, not to be ruled by the pulpit choosing our president.  If religion takes control, the one in power might ban the Koran or the Torah.  Or, it might be a religion that bans the King James Bible.

Party strength and weakness were evident in the election—and who could raise the most money.  The Democrats couldn’t seem to get in step.  And the Republicans marched to one cadence.  And money made a difference, as usual.

The undercurrent of the political future was there for anyone who could see it.  Had John Kerry been elected, he would certainly been his party’s candidate for reelection in 2008.

That was Hillary Clinton’s worst nightmare.

She played coy during the campaign, gave lip service to Kerry’s candidacy, but no more.  In the later days of the campaign, Kerry was suddenly surrounded by the campaign veterans of the Clinton clan.  Were they there to help or hurt?  Regardless, he lost.

You can expect to see candidate Hilleary Clinton on the stump in four years.  Would anyone trash a lady’s reputation for the sake of winning an election?  Of course.  This is politics and everything goes.

In the meantime, we have learned nothing and the process will repeat itself.