Political
Footnotes
by
Stuart James


Return to Current IPS Features

Return to Catalogue

IPS Features Staff

International Press Service

 






So, Who Won the Debate? The Republican View

Sixty-seven million Americans watched President George Bush and Senator John Kerry debate foreign issues last week.  Since that time both the Republican and the Democratic Party are claiming victory.  With all of the spin doctoring from both parties, we are still left with the question: who won the debate?

After the debate, the Bush campaign found itself on the defensive.  Karl Rove, the President's chief political adviser, who normally avoids the press, came out of the “closet.” Mr. Rove, in deflecting arguments that the President appeared irritated, argued the president was focused during the debate.  Mr. Rove, according to a report from the New York Times this weekend, stated “that wasn’t irritated…I know irritated.”

However, many Republicans conceded Mr. Kerry had the upper hand.  According to the same New York Times report, Rep. Peter D. King (R) of New York said, "people…thought Kerry was going to get knocked out of the box…but he’s still in there."  Rep. King further stated "I was never one who thought this was going to be an easy race..."

The Times further reports that a senior republican strategist, speaking on condition of anonymity, said "part of Bush's strength is in his simplicity, but in that forum, it became shallowness.  That was a high-minded debate and there was a lot more depth to Kerry in his points than in Bush." 

Senator John McCain (R) also commented on the Kerry/Bush debate.  The New York Times reports Senator McCain stated "he presented himself well, John did.  Kerry came out slugging.  In the last six weeks, it was probably his brightest moment."

After watching the debate, it is obvious that John Kerry had the upper hand.  Mr. Kerry, surprisingly, came out of this debate as a clear, concise, and motivated candidate.  Prior to the debate, people were thinking, including some Democrats, the Kerry campaign was sliding into oblivion.  Although many polls show the race a dead heat, people thought Kerry lacked direction; that he failed to define himself as a candidate. Until he debated Bush, Kerry was thought to be losing this race

The President enjoys a folksy style that appeals to voters, reiterating the same "canned" message over and over again. The President has effectively stayed on message, using his message to convince voters he is a decisive leader who must remain in command. During this debate, the President’s canned message lacked substance; the message was simple, and repetitive. Bush appeared shallow and uninformed; relying on the “rally around the flag” strategy.

John Kerry showed he has the ability to campaign hard, with an ability to concisely discuss the issues with the American public.  Based upon the President's reaction during the debate, Mr. Kerry’s performance was unexpected.

The Republicans are right; John Kerry has the upper hand because his performance in this debate. If you think the President did well, just think about how those outside the campaign are reacting, what the Republicans are saying about their candidate…

Many Republicans believe “part of Bush's strength is in his simplicity…”  However, during this debate, Bush’s simplicity “became shallowness.”  It is Mr. Bush shallowness that caused him to lose this round.

Now for round 2.

Stuart James

Sjames139@comcast.net